Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Abdominal Pain Management and Point-of-care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: A Randomised, Prospective, Controlled Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Durgun, Yesim; Yurumez, Yusuf; Guner, Necip Gokhan; Aslan, Nuray; Durmus, Ensar; Kahraman, Yavuz
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-24T12:08:37Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-24T12:08:37Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 1022-386X
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2022.10.1260
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/99491
dc.description Bu yayın 06.11.1981 tarihli ve 17506 sayılı Resmî Gazete’de yayımlanan 2547 sayılı Yükseköğretim Kanunu’nun 4/c, 12/c, 42/c ve 42/d maddelerine dayalı 12/12/2019 tarih, 543 sayılı ve 05 numaralı Üniversite Senato Kararı ile hazırlanan Sakarya Üniversitesi Açık Bilim ve Açık Akademik Arşiv Yönergesi gereğince telif haklarına uygun olan nüsha açık akademik arşiv sistemine açık erişim olarak yüklenmiştir.
dc.description.abstract Objective: To determine the effect of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed during the initial evaluation phase of patients with acute abdominal pain.Study Design: Randomised controlled, parallel-group trial.Place and Duration of Study: Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey, from October 2019 to March 2020.Methodology: Patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute abdominal pain were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were permanent mental disability, age <18 years, abdominal trauma within the last 24 hours, pregnancy, morbid obesity, repeated admissions, referral from an external centre to the ED, and missing patient information. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: The control group where standard diagnostic strategies were applied and the POCUS group where POCUS was performed together with standard diagnostic strategies. The length of stay (LOS), differential diagnoses, cost and hospitalisa-tion or discharge from ED were compared.Results: The application of POCUS reduced the average number of preliminary differential diagnoses from four to two (p <0.001). Regarding patient outcomes, POCUS reduced LOS in ED in both the discharged and hospitalised patients (p = 0.003, and p = 0.049, respectively). In all patients, POCUS reduced LOS in ED but led to no significant changes in cost (p <0.001, p = and 0.403, respec-tively).Conclusion: POCUS in patients with acute abdominal pain is very useful in reducing the number of differential diagnoses and LOS in ED.
dc.language English
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher COLL PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS PAKISTAN
dc.relation.isversionof 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.10.1260
dc.subject General & Internal Medicine
dc.subject Abdominal pain
dc.subject Cost
dc.subject Emergency department
dc.subject Length of stay
dc.subject Point-of-care ultrasound
dc.title Abdominal Pain Management and Point-of-care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: A Randomised, Prospective, Controlled Study
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 32
dc.identifier.startpage 1260
dc.identifier.endpage 1265
dc.relation.journal JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN
dc.identifier.issue 10
dc.identifier.doi 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.10.1260
dc.identifier.eissn 1681-7168
dc.contributor.author Durgun, Yesim
dc.contributor.author Yurumez, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Guner, Necip Gokhan
dc.contributor.author Aslan, Nuray
dc.contributor.author Durmus, Ensar
dc.contributor.author Kahraman, Yavuz
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rights.openaccessdesignations gold


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record