Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

A Novel Method for Ultrasound-Guided Central Catheter Placement-Supraclavicular Brachiocephalic Vein Catheterization Versus Jugular Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Aydin, Tayfun; Balaban, Onur; Turgut, Miray; Tokur, Murat Emre; Musmul, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-20T13:25:05Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-20T13:25:05Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 1053-0770
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.010
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/99185
dc.description Bu yayının lisans anlaşması koşulları tam metin açık erişimine izin vermemektedir.
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To assess the superiority of a novel ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization technique, supraclavicular brachiocephalic catheterization, compared to jugular vein catheterization. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: Operating rooms and intensive care unit. Participants: Eighty-six patients with central catheter placement were included in the present study. Interventions: In the brachiocephalic group, ultrasound-guided catheterization of the brachiocephalic vein was performed via the supraclavicular route using needle-in-plane and syringe-free techniques. In the jugular group, ultrasound-guided catheterization of the internal jugular vein was performed using the needle-out-of-plane technique. Measurements and Main Results: Measurements included number of needle insertion attempts, ultrasonography times, and cannulation times. Additionally, ultrasound visibility of the veins, needle, guidewire, and catheter, as well as ease of the procedure, were assessed. Mean cannulation time was 27.65 +/- 25.36 seconds in Group B and 28.16 +/- 21.72 seconds in Group J. The overall success rate was 97.6% in Group B and 97.7% in Group J. The mean ease score of the cannulation procedure was 8.78 +/- 1.13 in Group B and 8.67 +/- 1.23 in Group J. No significant differences were detected between groups. The mean ultrasonography time was 11.98 +/- 6.91 seconds in Group B and 2.88 +/- 1.47 seconds in Group J. Ultrasound visibility of the brachiocephalic, jugular, and subclavian veins, as well as the needle and the guidewire, were good; however, visibility of the catheter was poor. Conclusions: Although not superior to the standard internal jugular approach, the novel supraclavicular approach proved to be a noninferior method for central venous cannulation. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language English
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.010
dc.subject Anesthesiology
dc.subject Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
dc.subject Respiratory System
dc.subject central venous catheter
dc.subject brachiocephalic vein
dc.subject supraclavicular
dc.subject ultrasound
dc.subject endocavity micro-convex probe
dc.title A Novel Method for Ultrasound-Guided Central Catheter Placement-Supraclavicular Brachiocephalic Vein Catheterization Versus Jugular Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Study
dc.identifier.volume 36
dc.identifier.startpage 998
dc.identifier.endpage 1006
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
dc.identifier.issue 4
dc.identifier.doi 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.010
dc.identifier.eissn 1532-8422
dc.contributor.author Aydin, Tayfun
dc.contributor.author Balaban, Onur
dc.contributor.author Turgut, Miray
dc.contributor.author Tokur, Murat Emre
dc.contributor.author Musmul, Ahmet
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record