Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Tensile bond strength of soft and hard relining materials to conventional and additively manufactured denture-base materials

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Koseoglu, Merve; Tugut, Faik; Akin, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-20T13:24:48Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-20T13:24:48Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 1059-941X
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13608
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/99013
dc.description Bu yayının lisans anlaşması koşulları tam metin açık erişimine izin vermemektedir.
dc.description.abstract Purpose Studies comparing tensile bond strength of various soft and hard denture liner materials to conventionally and additively manufactured denture base resins are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tensile bond strength between chair- and laboratory-side soft and hard relining materials and denture-base materials produced by additive manufacturing and conventional methods. Materials and methods A total of 120 dimethacrylate-based additively manufactured and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based conventionally fabricated dumbbell-shaped denture-base resins were produced. Heat-cured laboratory-side soft reline material, self-cured chair-side soft reline material, and self-cured chair-side hard reline material were attached to the denture bases. The tensile force was applied to the specimens with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The obtained data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. The significance level was set at alpha = 0.05. Results The highest tensile bond strength values were obtained in the specimens from the conventionally manufactured base and self-cured chair-side hard reline material group, and the lowest was seen in the additively fabricated base and self-cured chair-side soft reline material group (p < 0.001). Conventionally manufactured base material's tensile bond strength was higher than that of additively fabricated resin, and self-cured chair-side hard reline material's strength was higher than that of laboratory-side and chair-side soft reline materials (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference emerged between laboratory-side and chair-side soft reline materials (p = 0.405). Conclusions All the specimens used in the present study had tensile bonding stress values for clinical use. Both denture base resins provided an increased bond to the chair-side hard relining material, although an improved bond did not emerge for the chair-side and laboratory-side soft denture reline materials.
dc.language English
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1111/jopr.13608
dc.subject Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
dc.subject 3D printed dentures
dc.subject additive manufacturing
dc.subject denture base
dc.subject denture liner
dc.title Tensile bond strength of soft and hard relining materials to conventional and additively manufactured denture-base materials
dc.type Early Access
dc.contributor.authorID Akin, Hakan/0000-0002-4770-4297
dc.contributor.authorID Koseoglu, Merve/0000-0001-9110-9586
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/jopr.13608
dc.identifier.eissn 1532-849X
dc.contributor.author Koseoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.author Tugut, Faik
dc.contributor.author Akin, Hakan
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record