dc.rights.license |
Other Gold |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-06-03T08:20:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-06-03T08:20:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2567-9430 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
www.doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2019-0012 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/95111 |
|
dc.description |
Bu yayın 06.11.1981 tarihli ve 17506 sayılı Resmî Gazete’de yayımlanan 2547 sayılı Yükseköğretim Kanunu’nun 4/c, 12/c, 42/c ve 42/d maddelerine dayalı 12/12/2019 tarih, 543 sayılı ve 05 numaralı Üniversite Senato Kararı ile hazırlanan Sakarya Üniversitesi Açık Bilim ve Açık Akademik Arşiv Yönergesi gereğince açık akademik arşiv sistemine açık erişim olarak yüklenmiştir. |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Objectives: To test the performance of the newly available rapid test for syphilis, we compared it with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA). Additionally, we investigated the performance of rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays (CMIA) at our laboratory using TPHA as a gold standard. Methods: The serum samples of 595 patients with the prediagnosis of syphilis were studied by four serological methods. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of RPR, CMIA, and syphilis rapid test were assessed by utilizing TPHA as a gold standard for the diagnosis of syphilis. Results: Of the patients, 6.2% (37/595) had positive RPR, 5.5% (33/595) had positive CMIA, 5.5% (33/595) had a positive rapid immunochromatographic method and 5% (30/595) had positive TPHA. When TPHA results were taken as the reference, the sensitivity of the rapid test for syphilis was 100%, the specificity was 99.5%, PPV was 90.9%, and NPV was 100.0%. Conclusions: It was observed that the rapid test for syphilis used in the study was quite successful, its cost was appropriate, and the test was very fast and easy to apply. At the same time, the agreement between syphilis rapid test and TPHA was found to be excellent. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.language.iso |
İngilizce |
|
dc.publisher |
WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1515/labmed-2019-0012 |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
dc.subject |
ANTIGEN ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY |
|
dc.subject |
TREPONEMA-PALLIDUM |
|
dc.subject |
EUROPEAN GUIDELINE |
|
dc.subject |
ASSAY |
|
dc.subject |
ANTIBODIES |
|
dc.subject |
MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CMIA |
|
dc.subject |
rapid immunochromatographic test |
|
dc.subject |
RPR |
|
dc.subject |
syphilis serodiagnosis |
|
dc.subject |
TPHA |
|
dc.title |
Investigation of the rapid immunochromatographic test performance in the diagnosis of syphilis; comparison of four serological methods |
|
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.contributor.authorID |
Altindis, Mustafa/0000-0003-0411-9669 |
|
dc.identifier.volume |
44 |
|
dc.identifier.startpage |
221 |
|
dc.identifier.endpage |
226 |
|
dc.relation.journal |
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE |
|
dc.identifier.issue |
4 |
|
dc.identifier.wos |
WOS:000565876400007 |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1515/labmed-2019-0012 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2567-9449 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Terzi, Huseyin Agah |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Aydemir, Ozlem |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Karakece, Engin |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hatipoglu, Huseyin |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Olmez, Mehmet |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Koroglu, Mehmet |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Altindis, Mustafa |
|
dc.relation.publicationcategory |
Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı |
|