Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Derincek, A; Turker, M; Cinar, M; Cetik, O; Kalaycioglu, B;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-17T11:59:33Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-17T11:59:33Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Derincek, A; Turker, M; Cinar, M; Cetik, O; Kalaycioglu, B; (2012). Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation. EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 23, 110-106
dc.identifier.issn 1305-8282
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/7172
dc.description.abstract Conclusion: Although pedicle hole PMMA augmentation is the gold standard for the failed screws in an osteoporotic bone, kyphoplasty augmented pedicle screw seems to be more effective method increasing the pullout strength.
dc.language English
dc.publisher TURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATION
dc.subject Surgery
dc.title Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 23
dc.identifier.startpage 106
dc.identifier.endpage 110
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Türker, Mehmet
dc.relation.journal EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000307145800010
dc.contributor.author Alihan Derincek
dc.contributor.author Türker, Mehmet
dc.contributor.author Murat Cinar
dc.contributor.author Ozgur Cetik
dc.contributor.author Baris Kalaycioglu


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record