Comparison of Polypropylene Mesh and Primary Repair in the Treatment of Blunt Testicular Rupture

dc.contributor.authors	Tahtali, IN; Halis, F; Yildiz, T; Gokce, A; Ilce, Z; Balabay, MD;
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-17T11:59:21Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-17T11:59:21Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.citation	Tahtali, IN; Halis, F; Yildiz, T; Gokce, A; Ilce, Z; Balabay, MD; (2016). Comparison of Polypropylene Mesh and Primary Repair in the Treatment of Blunt Testicular Rupture. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 13, 2868-2864
dc.identifier.issn	1735-1308
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/7075
dc.description.abstract	Conclusion: PM grafting is a safe alternative to primary closure of a TA defect following blunt testicular trauma.
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	UROL & NEPHROL RES CTR-UNRC
dc.subject	Urology & Nephrology
dc.title	Comparison of Polypropylene Mesh and Primary Repair in the Treatment of Blunt Testicular Rupture
dc.type	Article
dc.identifier.volume	13
dc.identifier.startpage	2864
dc.identifier.endpage	2868
dc.contributor.department	Sakarya Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor	Halis, Fikret
dc.contributor.saüauthor	Gökçe, Ahmet
dc.relation.journal	UROLOGY JOURNAL
dc.identifier.wos	WOS:000388158300011
dc.identifier.eissn	1735-546X
dc.contributor.author	Halis, Fikret
dc.contributor.author	Gökçe, Ahmet