Recurrent Tricuspid Insufficiency Is the Surgical Repair Technique a Risk Factor?

dc.contributor.authors	Kara, I; Koksal, C; Cakalagaoglu, C; Sahin, M; Yanartas, M; Ay, Y; Demir, S;
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-17T11:59:09Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-17T11:59:09Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.identifier.citation	Kara, I; Koksal, C; Cakalagaoglu, C; Sahin, M; Yanartas, M; Ay, Y; Demir, S; (2013). Recurrent Tricuspid Insufficiency Is the Surgical Repair Technique a Risk Factor?. TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, , 41-34
dc.identifier.issn	0730-2347
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/6909
dc.description.abstract	Ring annuloplasty provided the best relief from recurrent tricuspid insufficiency when compared with DeVega annuloplasty. Modified De Vega annuloplasty might be a suitable alternative to ring annuloplasty when rings are not available. (Tex Heart last J 2013;40(1): 34-41)
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	TEXAS HEART INST
dc.subject	Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
dc.title	Recurrent Tricuspid Insufficiency Is the Surgical Repair Technique a Risk Factor?
dc.type	Article
dc.identifier.startpage	34
dc.identifier.endpage	41
dc.contributor.department	Sakarya Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor	Kara, İbrahim
dc.relation.journal	TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL
dc.identifier.wos	WOS:000315017800009
dc.contributor.author	Kara, İbrahim
dc.contributor.author	Cengiz Koksal
dc.contributor.author	Canturk Cakalagaoglu
dc.contributor.author	Muslum Sahin
dc.contributor.author	Mehmet Yanartas
dc.contributor.author	Yasin Ay
dc.contributor.author	Serdar Demir