Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Comparative evaluation of the Brucella Coombs gel test in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Koroglu, M; Aydemir, OA; Demiray, T; Erkorkmaz, U; Ozbek, A; Altindis, M;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-27T07:19:48Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-27T07:19:48Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Koroglu, M; Aydemir, OA; Demiray, T; Erkorkmaz, U; Ozbek, A; Altindis, M; (2016). Comparative evaluation of the Brucella Coombs gel test in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 30, 975-970
dc.identifier.issn 1310-2818
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1190945
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/65462
dc.description.abstract Brucellosis is widespread among humans and animals. Diagnosis of brucellosis mostly depends on serological methods. Serological tests are preferred over time-consuming and hazardous bacterial cultures in routine laboratory practice. However, these tests are somehow challenging due to "incomplete/blocking antibodies' that prevent agglutination. Brucella Coombs gel test (BCGT) is newly developed test that contains Coombs antibodies (anti-human IgG) in gel microtubes and depends on gel centrifugation methods for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Here, performance of the BCGT is compared with standard serum tube agglutination (STA), standard serum tube agglutination with Coombs (C-STA) and immune capture agglutination (Brucellacapt). In total, 78 positive samples for study group and 16 samples for the control group were enrolled in the study. The samples were tested at dilutions of 1:40-1:5120. Titres at 1:160 and above were considered positive for brucellosis, whereas those lower than 1:160 were considered negative. Excellent agreement levels were determined between BCGT test and C-STA (kappa, 0.894; p < 0.001), and BCGT and Brucellacapt (kappa, 0.802; p < 0.001), when the diagnostic titre was accepted as 1:160. BCGT is easy to apply and interpret and provides reliable titre results in less than 2 h. It is also advantageous for screening.
dc.language English
dc.publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.subject Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
dc.title Comparative evaluation of the Brucella Coombs gel test in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 30
dc.identifier.startpage 970
dc.identifier.endpage 975
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Köroğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.saüauthor Erkorkmaz, Ünal
dc.contributor.saüauthor Özbek, Ahmet
dc.contributor.saüauthor Altındiş, Mustafa
dc.relation.journal BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000384537200020
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/13102818.2016.1190945
dc.identifier.eissn 1314-3530
dc.contributor.author Köroğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.author Erkorkmaz, Ünal
dc.contributor.author Özbek, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Altındiş, Mustafa


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record