Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

The Mw=5.8 2019 Silivri earthquake, NW Turkiye: is it a warning beacon for a big one?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Utkucu, Murat; Uzunca, Fatih; Durmus, Hatice; Nalbant, Sueleyman Sami; Ipek, Cengiz; Ramazanoglu, Sefik
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-23T11:14:13Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-23T11:14:13Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.issn 1437-3254
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-023-02359-6
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/102071
dc.description Bu yayının lisans anlaşması koşulları tam metin açık erişimine izin vermemektedir.
dc.description.abstract The September 26, 2019 Silivri earthquake (M-W = 5.8) occurred along the North Anatolian Fault beneath the Marmara Sea and its epicenter was in an identified seismic gap. Coseismic stress calculations demonstrate that the 1999 Izmit earthquake (M-W = 7.4) caused stress increase from 0.057 to 0.114 bars at its hypocenter, depending on the various reported rupture parameters. In addition, over 20 years following the 1999 earthquake, and constituting the main difference from previous studies, viscoelastic postseismic stress computations indicate stress increase from 0.081 to 0.135 bars at the hypocenter. In spite of the positive stress transfer, the 2019 earthquake occurred long after the end of the computed aftershock time span (similar to 16 years) of the 1999 earthquake. Plots of the seismicity around selected points within the gap also show that the background seismicity level following the 1999 earthquake was reached in 2003. Therefore, it is suggested that the 2019 earthquake was not an aftershock but rather an independent event, and its occurrence was hastened about 4 years due to stress loading. Further analysis of the seismicity between 1978 and 2020 indicates that the b value increased from a range of 1.0-1.1 to 1.6-1.8 till 2002, then progressively decreased to 0.9-1.0, which is consistent with positive stress transfer. The stress increase ranging from 0.19 to 2.52 bars on the segments within the gap brought forward their seismic cycles about 33 and 2 years from east to west, respectively. These additional clock advances in the seismic cycles due to stress load urgently require risk mitigating actions.
dc.language.iso English
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1007/s00531-023-02359-6
dc.subject NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT
dc.subject MARMARA PULL-APART
dc.subject IZMIT EARTHQUAKE
dc.subject SEISMIC HAZARD
dc.subject STRESS CHANGES
dc.subject SEA REGION
dc.subject TURKEY
dc.subject SLIP
dc.subject ACCUMULATION
dc.subject AFTERSHOCKS
dc.title The Mw=5.8 2019 Silivri earthquake, NW Turkiye: is it a warning beacon for a big one?
dc.type Article; Early Access
dc.contributor.authorID Ipek, Cengiz/0000-0001-5319-1048
dc.contributor.authorID Nalbant, Suleyman Sami/0000-0002-7944-5912
dc.relation.journal INT J EARTH SCI
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00531-023-02359-6
dc.identifier.eissn 1437-3262
dc.contributor.author Utkucu, M
dc.contributor.author Uzunca, F
dc.contributor.author Durmus, H
dc.contributor.author Nalbant, SS
dc.contributor.author Ipek, C
dc.contributor.author Ramazanoglu, S
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record