Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Energy consumption, economic growth and Ecological footprint relationship in the top Russian energy importers: a panel data analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Oncel, Abidin; Kabasakal, Ali; Kutlar, Aziz; Acar, Samet
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-23T11:14:06Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-23T11:14:06Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.issn 1387-585X
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03517-1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/102022
dc.description Bu yayının lisans anlaşması koşulları tam metin açık erişimine izin vermemektedir.
dc.description.abstract This study examines the relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and ecological footprint for the top 14 Russian-energy-importing countries in 2000-2018. Through PVAR analysis, this study calculates the long-term correlation between variables using a VEC model. The VAR approach addresses the endogeneity issue by including endogenous interactions between the variables in the model. Additionally, the impulse response functions and the influence of various variables on certain lags are evaluated. Cointegration between variables was assessed using DOLS and FMOLS panel analysis to investigate the long-term link further. Our findings demonstrate that there is a cointegration relationship between all series. According to the impulse response analysis results, an energy shock from Russia will negatively affect the countries' economic growth and decrease the ecological footprint. Increasing renewable and non-renewable energy consumption domestically increases ecological footprint, but the effect of renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint seems to be less. According to DOLS findings, a 10 percent increase in Russian fuel exports increases the elasticity of economic growth by 0.61%. In contrast, FMOLS findings indicate that a 10% increase in Russian fuel export increases the elasticity of economic growth by 1%. However, the direction of the relationship is positive when the ecological footprint is considered the dependent variable: While the non-renewable energy consumption elasticity coefficient was 0.030 in the DOLS model, it was found to be 0.023 in the FMOLS model. The elasticity value of the economic growth variable was found to be 0.69 in the FMOLS model.
dc.language.iso English
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1007/s10668-023-03517-1
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE
dc.subject UNIT-ROOT TESTS
dc.subject LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST
dc.subject RENEWABLE ENERGY
dc.subject ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION
dc.subject FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject COINTEGRATION
dc.subject COUNTRIES
dc.subject NEXUS
dc.subject REGRESSION
dc.title Energy consumption, economic growth and Ecological footprint relationship in the top Russian energy importers: a panel data analysis
dc.type Article; Early Access
dc.contributor.authorID ACAR, Samet/0000-0002-1426-7713
dc.relation.journal ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10668-023-03517-1
dc.identifier.eissn 1573-2975
dc.contributor.author Oncel, A
dc.contributor.author Kabasakal, A
dc.contributor.author Kutlar, A
dc.contributor.author Acar, S
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record