Araştırmada, Sovyet döneminde yazılan, ardından Sovyetlerin çöküşünden sonra yenilenerek Azerbaycan’da okutulan Tarih ders kitapları irdelenerek, karşılaştırmalı analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. İncelenen dersliklerde dikkat ettiğimiz konu, o dönem yazılan Tarih ders kitaplarındaki, Türkiye ve Osmanlı imgesinin yeri olmaktadır. Çalışmada, Sovyet dönemi Ortaöğretim sınıf ders kitapları, Sovyet sonrası Cumhuriyet dönemi ortaöğretim sınıf ders kitaplarının yanı sıra Yüksekokul ve Üniversitelerde okutulan kitapların da analizi yapılmaktadır. Sovyet döneminde öğretilen Tarih dersliklerinde hem Osmanlı hem de Türkiye algısına zaman zaman yeteri kadar yer verilmektedir. Nesnel tarzda anlatıma yer veren Sovyet derslikleri Türk Tarihinin birtakım kısımlarına daha çok yer vererek dikkatleri o alana toplamaya çalışmıştır. Sovyet döneminde yazılan Tarih dersliklerinde Osmanlı hasta devlet olarak nitelendirilmeye çalışılsa da Azerbaycan bağımsızlığını kazandıktan hemen sonra ders kitaplarındaki değişimin ardından, Osmanlının büyük bir devletçilik kültürüne sahip olduğu ve egemen tarih kuran kardeş halktan geldiği düşüncesi öğretilmeye yeltenilmiştir.
In the study, History textbooks written in the Soviet_x000D_
period and then renewed after the collapse of the Soviet Union_x000D_
were examined and examined by comparative analysis method._x000D_
We pay attention in classrooms studied the subject, history_x000D_
textbooks written in that period, Ottoman Turkey and is the location of the image. In this study, secondary school classroom_x000D_
textbooks in the Soviet period, secondary school classroom_x000D_
textbooks in the post-Soviet Republic period, as well as the books taught in colleges and universities are analyzed. During the_x000D_
Soviet era in the history taught in classrooms as well as Ottoman Turkey from time to time, it is given enough space perception. In addition to the information; visuals, maps and primary_x000D_
sources do not hesitate to use the education system of the period, the desired effect on the students to do more than necessary. Although it was tried to characterize the Ottoman state as_x000D_
a sick state in the history classrooms written in the Soviet period, after the change in the textbooks immediately after gaining the independence of Azerbaijan, it was attempted to teach_x000D_
that the Ottomans had a great statist culture and came from the_x000D_
brotherly people who established a sovereign history.
In the study, History textbooks written in the Soviet period and then renewed after the collapse of the Soviet Union were examined and examined by comparative analysis method. We pay attention in classrooms studied the subject, history textbooks written in that period, Ottoman Turkey and is the location of the image. In this study, secondary school classroom textbooks in the Soviet period, secondary school classroom textbooks in the post-Soviet Republic period, as well as the books taught in colleges and universities are analyzed. During the Soviet era in the history taught in classrooms as well as Ottoman Turkey from time to time, it is given enough space perception. In addition to the information; visuals, maps and primary sources do not hesitate to use the education system of the period, the desired effect on the students to do more than necessary. Although it was tried to characterize the Ottoman state as a sick state in the history classrooms written in the Soviet period, after the change in the textbooks immediately after gaining the independence of Azerbaijan, it was attempted to teach that the Ottomans had a great statist culture and came from the brotherly people who established a sovereign history.
