Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

PDE5 inhibitors: considerations for preference and long-term adherence

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Smith, WB; McCaslin, IR; Gokce, A; Mandava, SH; Trost, L; Hellstrom, WJ;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-17T11:59:09Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-17T11:59:09Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Smith, WB; McCaslin, IR; Gokce, A; Mandava, SH; Trost, L; Hellstrom, WJ; (2013). PDE5 inhibitors: considerations for preference and long-term adherence. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 67, 780-768
dc.identifier.issn 1368-5031
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/6917
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12074
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent condition affecting nearly one in five men worldwide. The advent of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) has revolutionised the ED treatment landscape and provided effective, minimally invasive therapies to restore male sexual function. Materials and methods: A pubmed search was performed of all English language articles from 1996 to present reviewing PDE5i, including pharmacokinetics, efficacy profiles and comparisons, where available. Results: Currently available PDE5i in the United States include sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil and avanafil, each of which has unique side effect, pharmacokinetic and outcome profiles. Sildenafil is associated with increased rate of visual changes, vardenafil with QT prolongation and tadalafil with lower back pain. Avanafil and vardenafil orodispersible tablet rapidly achieve peak plasma concentration, which results in faster onset of action, whereas tadalafil exhibits the longest half-life. First time response to PDE5i is approximately 60-70%, with no significant differences in efficacy noted among therapies. The literature does not clearly demonstrate a preference for one drug. High-treatment success rates (89%) were reported when patients were prescribed all available PDE5i. Daily dosing with tadalafil is associated with improved erectile function (EF) over time. Finally, novel modes of patient-provider interaction, including internet-based education, communication and prescribing, may also improve long-term adherence. Conclusions: PDE5i represent first line therapy for ED with excellent overall efficacy and satisfactory side effect profiles. Enhanced communciation, coupled with increased knowledge of drug characteristics, comparative treatment regimens and optimal prescribing patterns, offer compelling tools to improve long-term treatment success.
dc.language English
dc.publisher WILEY
dc.subject Pharmacology & Pharmacy
dc.title PDE5 inhibitors: considerations for preference and long-term adherence
dc.type Review
dc.identifier.volume 67
dc.identifier.startpage 768
dc.identifier.endpage 780
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Gökçe, Ahmet
dc.relation.journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000322036900012
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/ijcp.12074
dc.identifier.eissn 1742-1241
dc.contributor.author W. B. Smith
dc.contributor.author I. R. Mccaslin
dc.contributor.author A. Gokce
dc.contributor.author Gökçe, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author S. H. Mandava
dc.contributor.author L. Trost
dc.contributor.author W. J. Hellstrom


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record