Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Comparative performance evaluation of blast furnace flame temperature prediction using artificial intelligence and statistical methods

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Tunckaya, Y; Koklukaya, E;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-27T07:00:36Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-27T07:00:36Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Tunckaya, Y; Koklukaya, E; (2016). Comparative performance evaluation of blast furnace flame temperature prediction using artificial intelligence and statistical methods. TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 24, 1175-1163
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0632
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1309-242
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/64803
dc.description.abstract The blast furnace (BF) is the heart of the integrated iron and steel industry and used to produce melted iron as raw material for steel. The BF has very complicated process to be modeled as it depends on multivariable process inputs and disturbances. It is very important to minimize operational costs and reduce material and fuel consumption in order to optimize overall furnace efficiency and stability, and also to improve the lifetime of the furnace within this task. Therefore, if the actual flame temperature value is predicted and controlled properly, then the operators can maintain fuel distribution such as oxygen enrichment, blast moisture, cold blast temperature, cold blast flow, coke to ore ratio, and pulverized coal injection parameters in advance considering the thermal state changes accordingly. In this paper, artificial neural network (ANN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models are employed to forecast and track furnace flame temperature selecting the most appropriate inputs that affect this process parameter. All data were collected from Erdemir Blast Furnace No. 2, located in Eregli, Turkey, during 3 months of operation and the computational results are satisfactory in terms of the selected performance criteria: regression coefficient and root mean squared error. When the proposed model outputs are considered for the comparison, it is seen that the ANN models show better performance than the MLR and ARIMA models.
dc.language English
dc.publisher TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY
dc.subject Engineering
dc.title Comparative performance evaluation of blast furnace flame temperature prediction using artificial intelligence and statistical methods
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 24
dc.identifier.startpage 1163
dc.identifier.endpage 1175
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Köklükaya, Etem
dc.relation.journal TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000374121500034
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/elk-1309-242
dc.identifier.eissn 1303-6203
dc.contributor.author Yasin Tunckaya
dc.contributor.author Köklükaya, Etem


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record