Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Comparison of AR parametric methods with subspace-based methods for EMG signal classification using stand-alone and merged neural network models

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Bozkurt, MR; Subasi, A; Koklukaya, E; Yilmaz, M;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-27T07:00:36Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-27T07:00:36Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Bozkurt, MR; Subasi, A; Koklukaya, E; Yilmaz, M; (2016). Comparison of AR parametric methods with subspace-based methods for EMG signal classification using stand-alone and merged neural network models. TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 24, 1559-1547
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0632
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1309-1
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/64802
dc.description.abstract This research introduces an electromyogram (EMG) pattern classification of individual motor unit action potentials (MUPs) from intramuscular electromyographic signals. The presented technique automatically classifies EMG patterns into healthy, myopathic, or neurogenic categories. To extract a feature vector from the EMG signal, we use different autoregressive (AR) parametric methods and subspace-based methods. The proposal was validated using EMG recordings composed of 1200 EMG patterns obtained from 7 healthy, 7 myopathic, and 13 neurogenic-disordered people. A feedforward error backpropagation artificial neural network (FEBANN) and combined neural network (CNN) were used for classification, where the success rate was slightly higher in CNN. Among the different AR and subspace methods used in this study, the highest performance was obtained with the eigenvector method. The following rates were the results achieved by using the CNN. The correct classification rate for EMG patterns was 97% for healthy, 93% for myopathic, and 92% for neurogenic patterns. The obtained accuracy for EMG signal classification is approximately 94% for CNN. The rates for FEBANN were as follows: 97% for healthy patterns, 92% for myopathic patterns, and 91% for neurogenic patterns. The obtained accuracy was 93.3%. By directly using raw EMG signals, EMG classifications of healthy, myopathic, or neurogenic classes are automatically addressed.
dc.language English
dc.publisher TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY
dc.subject Engineering
dc.title Comparison of AR parametric methods with subspace-based methods for EMG signal classification using stand-alone and merged neural network models
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 24
dc.identifier.startpage 1547
dc.identifier.endpage 1559
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Bozkurt, Mehmet Recep
dc.contributor.saüauthor Köklükaya, Etem
dc.contributor.saüauthor Yılmaz, Mustafa
dc.relation.journal TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000374121500061
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/elk-1309-1
dc.identifier.eissn 1303-6203
dc.contributor.author Bozkurt, Mehmet Recep
dc.contributor.author Abdulhamit Subasi
dc.contributor.author Köklükaya, Etem
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Mustafa


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record