Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Analysis of an HCCI engine combustion using toluene reference fuel for different equivalence ratios - Comparison of experimental results with CFD and SRM simulations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Coskun, G; Delil, Y; Demir, U;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-26T08:46:54Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-26T08:46:54Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Coskun, G; Delil, Y; Demir, U; (2019). Analysis of an HCCI engine combustion using toluene reference fuel for different equivalence ratios - Comparison of experimental results with CFD and SRM simulations. FUEL, 247, 227-217
dc.identifier.issn 0016-2361
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.046
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/49998
dc.description.abstract In this study; performance of 0-D and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software with two different chemical mechanisms are investigated in an HCCI engine using toluene reference fuel (79% toluene and 21% n-heptane). For 0-D simulations, stochastic reactor model (SRM) has been used. SRM and CFD software were compared to each other for HCCI engine simulation by investigating in-cylinder pressure variations, Heat Release Rate (HRR) and emissions. For toluene reference fuel, a semi-detailed and a reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms were used during the simulations. It is observed that CFD and SRM simulations with reduced mechanism give better results for capturing pressure and HRR for lower lambda (lambda) values. But only CFD simulation with reduced mechanism could capture the experimental pressure and HRR results for higher lambda (lambda) values. On the other hand semi-detailed mechanism could predict early cold combustion reactions for all simulation strategies. It could be say that all simulation approaches with two different mechanism have almost similar results for HCCI combustion emissions.
dc.language English
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.subject Engineering
dc.title Analysis of an HCCI engine combustion using toluene reference fuel for different equivalence ratios - Comparison of experimental results with CFD and SRM simulations
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 247
dc.identifier.startpage 217
dc.identifier.endpage 227
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Coşkun, Gökhan
dc.relation.journal FUEL
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000463823800023
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.046
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-7153
dc.contributor.author Coşkun, Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Yusuf Delil
dc.contributor.author Usame Demir


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record