Filter by: Subject

Results Per Page:

Gazi Üniversitesi (1)
Görev (1)
Gündelik hayat (1)
Hadisler (1)
In this study, the biomotor and antropometric structural data of male volleyball players whose ages are between 16 and 18 and the affect of biomotor and antropometric structure on jumping are studied. In our study, we investigated 50 male volleyball players who are between 16 and 18 ages and who have won championships in their age groups in Sakarya3ahkesir,Kocaeli and Bartın. Our study has been designed in two steps.In the first step;skinfold,perimeter,radius and length measurements are taken from the players and these measurements are investigated.In the second step,the biometric features are measured. The and of the experiments. I have taken this result. 16 age sundown, weight, 61. 89±1 1.97kg, height 178.3 1±5.96 cm, sporth age 3.97±0.90, skinfold size: abdomen 14.00±8.75mm, femoris 13.56±6.09mm, biceps 4.94±1.88mm, triceps 7.42±2.91mm, suprailiac 18.32±1 0.76mm, subscapula 7.71±2.74mm, dreast 6.86±2.68mm, shank 12.18±5.59mm, wideness size; dreast size 287.52±23.72mm, dreast detth 206.57±23.88mm, hip size 328.47±24.36mm, shoulder size 417.94±31.78mm, surroundings; shoulder size 103.47±7.69cm, dreast size 82.78±7.13cm, dreast (ins) 88.47±7.65cm, abdomen size 71.44±8.19cm, hip size 95.15±7.19cm, thigh size 50.84±5.62cm, upper arm (ext) 24.02±2.07cm, upper arm (flex) 27.44±2.30cm, legth size; sitting size 89.89±4.45cm, swimming stroke 178.10±9.23cm, sholder-elbow length 34.44±2.75cm, front of length 26.00±1.84cm, leg size 92.57±3.66cm, biomotorik size; 20m speed 2.99±2.75sn, 100m speed 14.54±0.48sn, to stop long jump 2.11±0.15m, vertigal jump 54.26±6.39cm, shuttle 25.52±0.96, şmav 27.36±2.08, 12 dk running 2451.84±48.70m. 17 age sundown, weight 65.80±6.79kg, height 179.53±5.57cm, sporth age 3.53±1.49, skinfold size ; abdomen 11.93±4.19mm, femoris 13.14±3.29mm, biceps 4.76±0.91mm, triceps 8.25±1.73mm, suprailiac 15.76±6.63mm, subscapula 8.77±1.56mm, dreast EX6.13±1.73mm, shank 14.56±3.39mm. wideness size: dreast size 298.33±23.96mm, dreast detth 216.93±34.95mm, hip size 3 28. 26± 13. 80mm, shoulder size 43 1,53±29.65mm. surroundings; shoulder size 106.23±4.82cm, dreast size 84.10±5.48cm, dreast size (ins) 90.80±4.73cm, abdomen size 72.76±6.14cm, hip size 96.80±4.53cm, thigh size 51.66±2.88 cm, upper arm (ext) 24.53±1.66cm, upper arm (flex) 28.10±1.29cm. legth size; sitting size 93.06±5.29cm, swimming stroke 178.13±8.23cm, sholder-elbow length 34.66±2.55cm, front of length 27.10±1.87cm, leg size 92.00±2.92cm, biomotorik size: 20m speed 3.03±0.13sn, 100m speed 14.61±0.49sn, to stop long jump 2.18±0.12m,, vertigal jump 56.06±5.45cm, shuttle 25.20±0.94, sınav 27.60± 2.19, 12 dk running 2564.46±61.88m. 18 age sundown, weight 70.43±5.08kg, height 187.12±6.19cm, sporth age 3.78±1.44, skinfold size : abdomen 10.02±2.51mm, femoris 11.40±3.63mm, biceps 4.22±1.00mm, triceps 7.48±2.10mm, suprailiac 11.71±2.50mm, subscapula 8.60±1.29mm, dreast 5.68±0.94mm, shank 11.38±3.48mm, wideness size; dreast size 320.50±15.67mm, dreast detth 258.43±55.99mm, hip size 335.37±12.89mm, shoulder size 448.93±1 5.37mm, surroundings: shoulder size 108.81±5.86cm, dreast size 85.12±3.64 cm, dreast size (ins) 92.68±3.87cm, hip size 74.00±3.66cm, thigh size 52.75±1.61cm, upper arm (ext) 26.15±1.80cm, upper arm (flex) 30.37±1.50cm, legth size; sitting size 96.25±2.15cm, swimming stroke 189.81±6.82cm, sholder-elbow length 37.15±2.52cm, front of length 29.84±1.58cm, leg size 96c68±4.49cm, biomotorik size; 20m speed 2.83±0.02sn, 100m speed 13.96±0.97sn, to stop long jump 2.34±0.10m, vertigal jump 61.10±4.03cm, shuttle 28,68±1.81, sınav 29.12±1.50, 12 dk running 2656.50±45.81m. In conclusion it is seen that as the players get older between 16 and 18 ages,their biomotor features increase.Moreover,it is found that there is a positive correlation between jumping and biomotor and antropometric features. This conclusion supports the former studies on this area. (1)
In this study, we have taken up 20 Badminton players from the TurkeyBadminton league. They are (15,16,17) years old, and these two groups(Age, Gender) have been tested as to the times of reaction during the exercises. The time of the reaction of the gender;right hand GirlsPlayer, left hand and two hand and ;age, right hand reaction time 17, left hand reaction time 17, two hand reaction time 1 7 and volume reaction time, are very superior. This research also has been made as to serve the science. (1)
In this study,the biomotor and antropometric features of the athletes who are running short and long distances are studied. In 1998,60 athletes from the national team candidates,30 from short runners and 30 from long runners,have been used in this study.49 parameters,which are testing antropometric and biomotoric features,have been tested. The and of the experiments I have taken this result.; long runners, age 20.56±4.65, weight 62.18±5.18 kg, height 174.53±5.59cm, sporth age 6.86±3.58, skinfold size, abdomen 7.54±1.99, femoris 7.01Ü.73, biceps 3.13±0.40, triceps 5.02±0.97, suprailiac 10.34±2.75, subscapula 7.64Ü.51, dreast 4.70±1.05, calf 6.10±1.38, wideness size. dreast size 271.20±14.04, dreast detth 215.30±12.02, hip size 307.63±20.80, shoulder wideness 421.13±16.90, diz genişliği 94.00±4.74, ayak bileği genişliği 68.33±3.64, surroundings size, shoulder size 105.96±17.42, dreast size (exp) 87.70±3.22,, dreast size (insp) 94.03±3.54, abdomen size 73.13±5.70, hip size 94.70±4.60, thigh size 50.13±2.43, diz çevresi 35.40±1.40, calf size 35.10±1.97, upper arm size(ext) 23.16±1.36, upper arm size (flex) 27.53Ü.63, length size; sitting size 91.26±2.62, swimming stroke 172.20±5.81, sholder elbow length 34.90±1.72, front of length 26.23±1.35, thigh length 43.40±2.62, calf length 42.16±2.58, leg size 91.23*3.61, biomotorik size. 30m speed 4.03±0.13, 100m speed 12.53±0.44, to stop long jump 224.30±10.12, vertical jump 52.20± 7.38, 12 dk running 3944.66±149.52. Short runners age, 22.46±2.33, weight 70.80±3.31, height 179.23±2.59, sporth age 6.00±1.08, skinfold size, abdomen 6.07±0.54, femoris 5.75±0.65, biceps 3.52±0.37, triceps 3.99±0.40, suprailiac 7.59±0.47, subscapula 6.79±0.56, dreast 4.34±0.39, calf 4.70±0.47, wideness size, dreast size 279.16±5.58, dreast detth 229.96±4.36, hip size 321.90±7.71, shoulder wideness 431.06±7.68, diz genişliği 92.43±2.82, ayak bileği genişliği 68.86±2.08, surroundings size, shoulder size 107.33±2.34, hip size 97.10±6.13, thigh size 54.33±1.68, diz çevresi 34.80±2.28, calf size 36.93Ü.59, upper arm size (ext) 24.20±0.88, upper arm size (flex) 28.43Ü.13, length size: sitting size 91.86Ü.33, vnswimming stroke 177.93±4.84, sholder elbow length 36.26±1.46, front of length 26.73±0.73, thigh length 43.46±1.65, calf length 43.40±1.19, leg size 93.26±1.87, biomotorik size. 30m speed 3.63±0.02, 100m speed 11.14±0.11, to stop long jump 261.10±18.17, vertical jump 72.03±2.26, 12 dk running 3047±75.39. In conclusion^ is found that there is no correlation between the length parameters and the performence of the athletes who are running long and short distances.lt is seen that the measurement of the skinfold, when it is less,affects the performance positively. In biomotoric tests,it is seen that short distance runnersare better than long distance runners, but on the other hand when we consider the strength of them,the situation is on the other way around. In the former studies,it is seen that all the athletes who are running short or long distances have low skinfold percent. vm (1)
In today's rapidly changing and developing world, survival effort that firms should perform is getting bigger. It is also inevitable to carry out modifications in managing forms, quality systems and technics of firms, in order to be able cope with the competition having a larger scale because of the globalisation. Regarding the selection of a good quality and management system, it is known that the system which conducts firms to success is Total Quality Management System. Total Quality Management System being at the same time a quality system and management system is the best practice developed today. This study aims to promote existing quality systems and then to examine the practices in the pharmaceutical sector is consists of four main chapters. The study starts with the presentation of general concepts. The aim is to describe the concepts the study is based on and make the point that the study aims to put forward easier to understand. The systems to ensure quality are explained in the first chapter. The developments in the field of quality starting from practices of quality control, to the most recent point of developments in the practices regarding quality, are explained one by one respecting a chronological order. The approaches, philosophies and theories which influenced the quality and practices regarding quality are jointly studied. After having clarified the concepts and practices such as medicines, pharmaceutical industry, quality and as quality assurance systems, which constitute the components of quality assurance systems in medicine industry, the scope of GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) including the necessary rules to comply with in the medicine sector in order to ensure the quality, are brought up in the third chapter. The aim here, is to give to the reader the opportunity to compare the practice in the medicine sector with other applications included in the study.In the last chapter there is a research on quality systems of the firms acting in Turkish medicine sector. In this research it is brought up the firms' philosophy and approaches on quality, and what they have done. As a result of the study it is revealed that the firms acting in the Turkish medicine sector are serious about the quality and carry on lots of activities regarding quality. In this issue, it is understood that the compulsory GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) rules determined by World Health Organisation have had a determining effect. Another important conclusion revealed by the study is that the firms included in the study name their approach to quality, as the approach of Total Quality Management. However, there are some discrepancies between firms' quality understanding and philosophy, some practices regarding quality and the understanding, philosophy and practices of Total Quality Management. Although firms declare that they adopt the approach of Total Quality Management, they define quality as " guality is the conformity with the specifications". The systems encouraging participation and creativity generally doesn't exist in the firms. Half of the firms have not award system as an important part of Total Quality Management There are firms which declare that they carry on Total Quality Management system since they only implement education of their managers. Some firms see quality as an issue under the responsibility of their Quality Control and Guaranty for Quality departments. These discrepancies and lots of similar ones uncover that these firms couldn't actually conceive and properly understand the approach of Total Quality Management. IX. YflKSKtöRSTİM KDRULu DOKÜMANTASYON MERKEPTaking into consideration that the firms in the medicine sector intensely carry out activities to insure quality and the forms of organisation they adopt to achieve quality we conclude that these firms practise the Guaranty for Quality approach. Taking into account the point reached regarding the concept of quality, the most striking result revealed out is that the quality is defined by the customer. Because, the quality defined by the customer represents her or his own needs, wishes and valuations. The existence of firms providing products and services is attributed to the dependence of the customer on that firms' products. For this reason installing the systems which will be able to provide on time products satisfying the customer which the customer demands or may demand, has become in important necessity. The system of Total Quality Management among systems of Providing Quality is a system which will be able to satisfy the necessity stated above. The system of Guaranty for Quality, although being a system set up to insure prevention of poor quality products to reach the customers, is finally inadequate aiming to benefit form human factor as far as it is possible. As a result, it is not as effective as Total Quality Management system with regard to cope with nowadays' severe competition. Because, it is necessary to provide the products demanded by customer at lowest price, highest effectiveness and before other competitors in the market. This is possible only by the active contribution of all to the effort fot quality, not only with physical power but also with ideas, suggestions and participation. (1)
İlaç firmaları (1)
İstihdam (1)