Comparison of anti-embolic protection with proximal balloon occlusion and filter devices during carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural outcomes

Alkan, Murat

dc.contributor.authors	Tatli, E; Buturak, A; Grunduz, Y; Dogan, E; Alkan, M; Sayin, M; Yilmaztepe, M; Atakay, S;
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-14T07:50:42Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-14T07:50:42Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.identifier.citation	Tatli, E; Buturak, A; Grunduz, Y; Dogan, E; Alkan, M; Sayin, M; Yilmaztepe, M; Atakay, S; (2013). Comparison of anti-embolic protection with proximal balloon occlusion and filter devices during carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural outcomes. POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 9, 227-221
dc.identifier.issn	1734-9338
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/3367
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2013.37499
dc.description.abstract	Conclusions: There was no difference between the clinical periprocedural and 30-day adverse event rates of distal filter and proximal balloon protection systems. However, distal filter protection systems showed higher rates of periprocedural ICA vasospasm.
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
dc.subject	Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
dc.title	Comparison of anti-embolic protection with proximal balloon occlusion and filter devices during carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural outcomes
dc.type	Article
dc.identifier.volume	9
dc.identifier.startpage	221
dc.identifier.endpage	227
dc.contributor.department	Sakarya Üniversitesi/Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi/Sanat Tarihi Bölümü
dc.contributor.saüauthor	Alkan, Murat
dc.relation.journal	POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ
dc.identifier.wos	WOS:000324967000004
dc.identifier.doi	10.5114/pwki.2013.37499
dc.identifier.eissn	1897-4295
dc.contributor.author	Alkan, Murat