Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

Comparison of segmentation algorithms for detection of hotspots in bone scintigraphy images and effects on CAD systems

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Aslantas, A; Emre, D; Cakiroglu, M;
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-13T12:15:21Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-13T12:15:21Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Aslantas, A; Emre, D; Cakiroglu, M; (2017). Comparison of segmentation algorithms for detection of hotspots in bone scintigraphy images and effects on CAD systems. BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 28, 683-676
dc.identifier.issn 0970-938X
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/2877
dc.identifier.uri https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/comparison-of-segmentation-algorithms-for-detection-of-hotspots-in-bone-scintigraphy-images-and-effects-on-cad-systems.pdf
dc.description.abstract The bone scintigraphy scan is one of the most common diagnostic procedures in nuclear medicine for detection of bone metastases. All involvements detected by the imaging process are called hot spots, whether or not they indicate metastasis. Our major concern is the successful segmentation of hot spots, which affects the accuracy of CAD systems developed for the detection of bone metastases. This study examined the extent to which segmentation algorithms can affect the success rate of CAD systems, both in terms of time and of making a correct decision. There is no perfect segmentation algorithm that will provide excellent results for all image types. Using a system developed by the authors, the present study compared several segmentation algorithms for detection of hot spots. Three algorithms known to provide the best results (FCM, SOM, and LSAC) were examined for all details and from different angles. Their performance was measured as 54%, 79%, and 88%, respectively, confirming LSAC as the most appropriate segmentation algorithm. Data obtained by application of the segmentation algorithms were used as input to an artificial neural network model, and the accuracy of the CAD system was measured for each segmentation method. CAD system accuracy rates are 92.3% for LSAC, 86.93% for SOM and 84.62% for FCM. The tolerance of other the segmentation algorithms (FCM and SOM) was measured with reference to LSAC, returning error rates of 7.68% for FCM and 5.37% for SOM. In experimental studies of a total of 706 pelvises, whole body, and chest images, results indicate that more successful segmentation increases the accuracy of CAD systems.
dc.language English
dc.publisher ALLIED ACAD
dc.subject Research & Experimental Medicine
dc.title Comparison of segmentation algorithms for detection of hotspots in bone scintigraphy images and effects on CAD systems
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 28
dc.identifier.startpage 676
dc.identifier.endpage 683
dc.contributor.department Sakarya Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
dc.contributor.saüauthor Dandıl, Emre
dc.contributor.saüauthor Çakıroğlu, Murat
dc.relation.journal BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000393490700031
dc.identifier.eissn 0976-1683
dc.contributor.author Ali Aslantas
dc.contributor.author Dandıl, Emre
dc.contributor.author Çakıroğlu, Murat


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record