Açık Akademik Arşiv Sistemi

A change is gonna come: will traditional meat production end?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authors Simdi, Halil; Seker, Ayberk
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-20T13:24:54Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-20T13:24:54Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 0944-1344
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17829-0
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/99082
dc.description Bu yayının lisans anlaşması koşulları tam metin açık erişimine izin vermemektedir.
dc.description.abstract Recently, the world has faced environmental disasters mainly due to global warming. One of the main reasons for global temperature imbalances is the greenhouse gases (GHG) that soar the atmosphere's heat. The major aim of the current study is to explore whether the livestock population is the main contributor to GHG emission through econometric estimations. In this study, we examine the impact of livestock population with other explanatory variables-GDP per capita, Economic Complexity Index (ECI), ecological balance, and total patent applications-over GHG emission of 25 countries responsible for 76% of GHG emission between 1990 and 2017. To investigate the relationship of variables, Fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) are used, as well as panel causality. Also, the relationship is examined by using the responsiveness scores (RS) approach. The empirical results reveal that all variables have a causal relationship with GHG emission. GDP per capita, ECI, and livestock population enhance the GHG emission whereas square of GDP per capita and ecological balance decline the environmental degradation. The paper demonstrates that the environmental Kuznets curve is valid and supports the literature. Lastly, the RS estimation results reveal that the livestock population is causing higher GHG emissions for all countries in the analysis, contrary to other independent variables. Governments should promote carbon-neutral meat production facilities instead of traditional beef farms to live in a more sustainable world. In the future, countries that invest in research and development (R&D) for less emission meat production will have a comparative advantage in the sustainable international meat market.
dc.language English
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1007/s11356-021-17829-0
dc.subject Environmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject Greenhouse gases emission
dc.subject Sustainable environmental management
dc.subject Livestock population
dc.subject Cultured meat
dc.subject Sustainable meat production
dc.title A change is gonna come: will traditional meat production end?
dc.contributor.authorID SIMDI, HALIL/0000-0002-9395-0667
dc.identifier.volume 29
dc.identifier.startpage 30470
dc.identifier.endpage 30485
dc.relation.journal ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
dc.identifier.issue 20
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11356-021-17829-0
dc.identifier.eissn 1614-7499
dc.contributor.author Simdi, Halil
dc.contributor.author Seker, Ayberk
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record