Missing intrauterine devices, laparoscopic and a_x000D_ conventional management: A single–center experience

Abstract

Introduction: Intrauterine contraception devices (IUCD) are frequently and safely used in pregnancy control. Migration related complications, such as adhesions and perforations, can be encountered as the most important_x000D_ but rare circumstances. In such cases, the laparoscopic approach is beneficial with the least harm principle._x000D_ Materials and Methods: This study included ten patients who were admitted to our hospital between 2015–_x000D_ 2019 with chronic abdominal pain, induced by migrated intrauterine devices. Patients’ complaints, radiological methods used in diagnosis, IUCD insertion timing, migration of IUCD and time interval to diagnosis, intra–abdominal migration points, and types, as well as surgical interventions, were evaluated retrospectively._x000D_ Results: While all patients were diagnosed with abdominal ultrasonography and gynecological examination, some patients underwent computed tomography 60% and plain radiogram 20% as additional imaging._x000D_ While the intra–abdominal migration site of IUCD was ascertained as the most common localization in the_x000D_ lower right quadrant of the omentum (30%), the placement in the umbilical hernia site was the rarest and the_x000D_ only one in the literature. Three different types of IUCD were detected; Copper–T (80%) was the most common, while IUCDs were laparoscopically removed in all patients except for the patient who underwent open_x000D_ surgery due to acute cholecystitis. All patients who had laparoscopic surgery were discharged the next day._x000D_ Conclusion: In conclusion, the IUCD’s frequency of use is increasing as the current method of contraception,_x000D_ dislocation of the device may be encountered if the required conditions are not taken into consideration_x000D_ during the application. In such a situation, laparoscopic removal of a dislocated IUCD is a safe, feasible, and_x000D_ less invasive method.